CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix S210
vs Nikon Coolpix S3000

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix S210

Nikon / 2008

Coolpix S210

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix S3000

Nikon / 2010

Coolpix S3000

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Coolpix S210
28 mm²
Coolpix S3000
Area ratio
1.15:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
14.6%

The Coolpix S3000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Coolpix S210MetricCoolpix S3000
8 MPEffective pixels12 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
100 gWeight116 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion (EN-EL10) Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion EN-EL10 battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix S3000 has the larger sensor area. The Coolpix S210 has the lighter body. The Coolpix S3000 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix S3000 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix S210

Released in 2008, Coolpix S210 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix S3000

Released in 2010, Coolpix S3000 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras