CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix P7000
vs Samsung SL310W

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix P7000

Nikon / 2010

Coolpix P7000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung SL310W

Samsung / 2008

SL310W

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
Coolpix P7000
42 mm²
SL310W
Area ratio
1.02:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.3%

The Coolpix P7000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Coolpix P7000MetricSL310W
10.1 MPEffective pixels13.6 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.44 × 5.58
2.05 µmPixel pitch1.75 µm
4.2 µm²Pixel area3.05 µm²
23.78 MP/cm²Pixel density32.76 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.65
—Maximum video—
360 gWeight—
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, SDHC, Secure Digital
DC 7.4 V, 1030 mAhBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix P7000 has the larger sensor area. The SL310W has the lighter body. The SL310W has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix P7000 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix P7000

Released in 2010, Coolpix P7000 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 360 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SL310W

Released in 2008, SL310W has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 13.6 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras