CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 3500
vs Nikon Coolpix 4500

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 3500

Nikon / 2002

Coolpix 3500

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 4500

Nikon / 2002

Coolpix 4500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Coolpix 3500
38 mm²
Coolpix 4500
Area ratio
1.78:1
Absolute difference
17 mm²
Relative difference
77.8%

The Coolpix 4500 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 3500MetricCoolpix 4500
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.9 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.62 µmPixel pitch3.12 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area9.72 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density10.29 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
205 gWeight420 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Nikon EN-EL2 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion batteryBatteryNikon EN-EL1 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 4500 has the larger sensor area. The Coolpix 3500 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 4500 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 3500 and Coolpix 4500 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 3500

Released in 2002, Coolpix 3500 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 205 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 4500

Released in 2002, Coolpix 4500 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.9 MP effective resolution, and a 420 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras