CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 2500
vs Nikon Coolpix 3700

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 2500

Nikon / 2002

Coolpix 2500

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 3700

Nikon / 2003

Coolpix 3700

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Coolpix 2500
21 mm²
Coolpix 3700
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix 2500 and Coolpix 3700 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 2500MetricCoolpix 3700
1.9 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.35 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
205 gWeight162 g
CompactFlash type IStorageSD card
Nikon EN-EL2 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion batteryBatteryNikon EN-EL5 Lithium-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 2500 and Coolpix 3700 have the same sensor area. The Coolpix 3700 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 3700 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 3700 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 2500

Released in 2002, Coolpix 2500 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 205 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 3700

Released in 2003, Coolpix 3700 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 162 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras