CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 2100
vs Olympus C-1 Zoom

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 2100

Nikon / 2003

Coolpix 2100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-1 Zoom

Olympus / 2001

C-1 Zoom

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
Coolpix 2100
15 mm²
C-1 Zoom
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix 2100 and C-1 Zoom have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 2100MetricC-1 Zoom
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.83 µmPixel pitch3.42 µm
7.98 µm²Pixel area11.67 µm²
12.53 MP/cm²Pixel density8.57 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight225 g
CompactFlash type IStorageSmartMedia
AA NiMH (2) batteries includedBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 2100 and C-1 Zoom have the same sensor area. The Coolpix 2100 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 2100 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 2100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 2100

Released in 2003, Coolpix 2100 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-1 Zoom

Released in 2001, C-1 Zoom has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 225 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras