CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 2100
vs Nikon Coolpix 4600

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 2100

Nikon / 2003

Coolpix 2100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 4600

Nikon / 2005

Coolpix 4600

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
Coolpix 2100
25 mm²
Coolpix 4600
Area ratio
1.64:1
Absolute difference
10 mm²
Relative difference
63.8%

The Coolpix 4600 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 2100MetricCoolpix 4600
1.9 MPEffective pixels3.9 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.83 µmPixel pitch2.52 µm
7.98 µm²Pixel area6.37 µm²
12.53 MP/cm²Pixel density15.7 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight130 g
CompactFlash type IStorageSecure Digital
AA NiMH (2) batteries includedBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 4600 has the larger sensor area. The Coolpix 4600 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 4600 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 4600 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 2100

Released in 2003, Coolpix 2100 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 4600

Released in 2005, Coolpix 4600 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.9 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras