CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minox DD1
vs Minox DD1 Diamond

Archive illustration for Minox DD1

Minox / 2003

DD1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minox DD1 Diamond

Minox / 2003

DD1 Diamond

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
DD1
31 mm²
DD1 Diamond
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DD1 and DD1 Diamond have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DD1MetricDD1 Diamond
2.1 MPEffective pixels2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.82 µmPixel pitch3.92 µm
14.63 µm²Pixel area15.36 µm²
6.84 MP/cm²Pixel density6.51 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight120 g
—Storage—
1x CR2 LithiumBattery1x CR2 Lithium

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DD1 and DD1 Diamond have the same sensor area. The DD1 and DD1 Diamond have the same body weight. The DD1 has the higher effective resolution. The DD1 and DD1 Diamond were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DD1

Released in 2003, DD1 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DD1 Diamond

Released in 2003, DD1 Diamond has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras