CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minox Classic Leica M3 3MP
vs Minox DD200

Archive illustration for Minox Classic Leica M3 3MP

Minox / 2004

Classic Leica M3 3MP

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minox DD200

Minox / 2004

DD200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Classic Leica M3 3MP
31 mm²
DD200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Classic Leica M3 3MP and DD200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Classic Leica M3 3MPMetricDD200
2.1 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.82 µmPixel pitch3.1 µm
14.63 µm²Pixel area9.6 µm²
6.84 MP/cm²Pixel density10.42 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
98 gWeight100 g
—StorageSecure Digital
1x CR2 LithiumBattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Classic Leica M3 3MP and DD200 have the same sensor area. The Classic Leica M3 3MP has the lighter body. The DD200 has the higher effective resolution. The Classic Leica M3 3MP and DD200 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Classic Leica M3 3MP

Released in 2004, Classic Leica M3 3MP has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 98 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DD200

Released in 2004, DD200 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras