CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minolta DiMAGE E323
vs Minolta DiMAGE X20

Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE E323

Minolta / 2003

DiMAGE E323

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE X20

Minolta / 2003

DiMAGE X20

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
DiMAGE E323
15 mm²
DiMAGE X20
Area ratio
1.41:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
40.6%

The DiMAGE E323 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DiMAGE E323MetricDiMAGE X20
3.2 MPEffective pixels2.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.58 µmPixel pitch2.69 µm
6.66 µm²Pixel area7.22 µm²
15.01 MP/cm²Pixel density13.85 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight115 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DiMAGE E323 has the larger sensor area. The DiMAGE X20 has the lighter body. The DiMAGE E323 has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE E323 and DiMAGE X20 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE E323

Released in 2003, DiMAGE E323 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE X20

Released in 2003, DiMAGE X20 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras