CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minolta DiMAGE E223
vs Minolta DiMAGE E323

Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE E223

Minolta / 2003

DiMAGE E223

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE E323

Minolta / 2003

DiMAGE E323

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
DiMAGE E223
21 mm²
DiMAGE E323
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DiMAGE E223 and DiMAGE E323 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DiMAGE E223MetricDiMAGE E323
2.1 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.19 µmPixel pitch2.58 µm
10.15 µm²Pixel area6.66 µm²
9.85 MP/cm²Pixel density15.01 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
240 gWeight145 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DiMAGE E223 and DiMAGE E323 have the same sensor area. The DiMAGE E323 has the lighter body. The DiMAGE E323 has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE E223 and DiMAGE E323 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE E223

Released in 2003, DiMAGE E223 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE E323

Released in 2003, DiMAGE E323 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras