CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minolta DiMAGE E201
vs Minolta DiMAGE S304

Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE E201

Minolta / 2001

DiMAGE E201

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE S304

Minolta / 2001

DiMAGE S304

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
DiMAGE E201
38 mm²
DiMAGE S304
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
5 mm²
Relative difference
12.1%

The DiMAGE E201 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DiMAGE E201MetricDiMAGE S304
2.3 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.3 µmPixel pitch3.37 µm
18.46 µm²Pixel area11.35 µm²
5.42 MP/cm²Pixel density8.81 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
300 gWeight410 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DiMAGE E201 has the larger sensor area. The DiMAGE E201 has the lighter body. The DiMAGE S304 has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE E201 and DiMAGE S304 were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE E201

Released in 2001, DiMAGE E201 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 2.3 MP effective resolution, and a 300 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE S304

Released in 2001, DiMAGE S304 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 410 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras