CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minolta DiMAGE 2330
vs Minolta DiMAGE E201

Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE 2330

Minolta / 2000

DiMAGE 2330

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE E201

Minolta / 2001

DiMAGE E201

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
DiMAGE 2330
42 mm²
DiMAGE E201
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DiMAGE 2330 and DiMAGE E201 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DiMAGE 2330MetricDiMAGE E201
2.3 MPEffective pixels2.3 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.53 × 5.64
4.3 µmPixel pitch4.3 µm
18.46 µm²Pixel area18.46 µm²
5.42 MP/cm²Pixel density5.42 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
360 gWeight300 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DiMAGE 2330 and DiMAGE E201 have the same sensor area. The DiMAGE E201 has the lighter body. The DiMAGE 2330 and DiMAGE E201 have the same effective resolution. The DiMAGE E201 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE 2330

Released in 2000, DiMAGE 2330 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 2.3 MP effective resolution, and a 360 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE E201

Released in 2001, DiMAGE E201 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 2.3 MP effective resolution, and a 300 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras