CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kyocera Finecam L3
vs Kyocera Finecam SL300R

Archive illustration for Kyocera Finecam L3

Kyocera / 2003

Finecam L3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kyocera Finecam SL300R

Kyocera / 2003

Finecam SL300R

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Finecam L3
21 mm²
Finecam SL300R
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Finecam L3 and Finecam SL300R have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Finecam L3MetricFinecam SL300R
3.2 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.58 µmPixel pitch2.53 µm
6.66 µm²Pixel area6.38 µm²
15.01 MP/cm²Pixel density15.67 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
215 gWeight125 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Finecam L3 and Finecam SL300R have the same sensor area. The Finecam SL300R has the lighter body. The Finecam SL300R has the higher effective resolution. The Finecam L3 and Finecam SL300R were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Finecam L3

Released in 2003, Finecam L3 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 215 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Finecam SL300R

Released in 2003, Finecam SL300R has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras