CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica Revio KD-420Z
vs Konica Revio KD-510Z

Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-420Z

Konica / 2003

Revio KD-420Z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-510Z

Konica / 2003

Revio KD-510Z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Revio KD-420Z
38 mm²
Revio KD-510Z
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
13 mm²
Relative difference
52.6%

The Revio KD-510Z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Revio KD-420ZMetricRevio KD-510Z
4.23 MPEffective pixels5.36 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.42 µmPixel pitch2.66 µm
5.87 µm²Pixel area7.07 µm²
17.03 MP/cm²Pixel density14.14 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight200 g
Memory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMemory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Revio KD-510Z has the larger sensor area. The Revio KD-420Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-510Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-420Z and Revio KD-510Z were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-420Z

Released in 2003, Revio KD-420Z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-510Z

Released in 2003, Revio KD-510Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.36 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras