CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica Revio KD-410Z
vs Konica Revio KD-420Z

Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-410Z

Konica / 2003

Revio KD-410Z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-420Z

Konica / 2003

Revio KD-420Z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Revio KD-410Z
25 mm²
Revio KD-420Z
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
13 mm²
Relative difference
52.6%

The Revio KD-410Z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Revio KD-410ZMetricRevio KD-420Z
4.13 MPEffective pixels4.23 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.03 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
9.18 µm²Pixel area5.87 µm²
10.9 MP/cm²Pixel density17.03 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight145 g
Memory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMemory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Revio KD-410Z has the larger sensor area. The Revio KD-420Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-420Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-410Z and Revio KD-420Z were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-410Z

Released in 2003, Revio KD-410Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.13 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-420Z

Released in 2003, Revio KD-420Z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras