Reasons to choose Revio KD-3300Z
Released in 2004, Revio KD-3300Z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica Revio KD-3300Z
vs Konica Revio KD-420Z
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Revio KD-3300Z25 mm²
Revio KD-420Z- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Revio KD-3300Z and Revio KD-420Z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Revio KD-3300ZMetricRevio KD-420Z
3.1 MPEffective pixels4.23 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.83 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
8.01 µm²Pixel area5.87 µm²
12.48 MP/cm²Pixel density17.03 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight145 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMemory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure Digital
1x CR-V3, 2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Revio KD-3300Z and Revio KD-420Z have the same sensor area. The Revio KD-420Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-420Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-3300Z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio KD-420Z
Released in 2003, Revio KD-420Z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.