Reasons to choose Revio KD-3300Z
Released in 2004, Revio KD-3300Z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica Revio KD-3300Z
vs Konica Revio KD-4000Z
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Revio KD-3300Z38 mm²
Revio KD-4000Z- Area ratio
- 1.53:1
- Absolute difference
- 13 mm²
- Relative difference
- 52.6%
The Revio KD-4000Z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Revio KD-3300ZMetricRevio KD-4000Z
3.1 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.83 µmPixel pitch3.08 µm
8.01 µm²Pixel area9.47 µm²
12.48 MP/cm²Pixel density10.56 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight180 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
1x CR-V3, 2x AABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Revio KD-4000Z has the larger sensor area. The Revio KD-4000Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-4000Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-3300Z and Revio KD-4000Z were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio KD-4000Z
Released in 2004, Revio KD-4000Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.