Reasons to choose Revio KD-300Z
Released in 2001, Revio KD-300Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 167 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica Revio KD-300Z
vs Konica Revio KD-400Z
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Revio KD-300Z38 mm²
Revio KD-400Z- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Revio KD-300Z and Revio KD-400Z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Revio KD-300ZMetricRevio KD-400Z
3.34 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.37 µmPixel pitch3.04 µm
11.35 µm²Pixel area9.24 µm²
8.81 MP/cm²Pixel density10.82 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
167 gWeight198 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMemory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Revio KD-300Z and Revio KD-400Z have the same sensor area. The Revio KD-300Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-400Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-400Z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio KD-400Z
Released in 2002, Revio KD-400Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 198 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.