CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica Revio KD-210Z
vs Konica Revio KD-500Z

Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-210Z

Konica / 2002

Revio KD-210Z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-500Z

Konica / 2002

Revio KD-500Z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Revio KD-210Z
38 mm²
Revio KD-500Z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Revio KD-210Z and Revio KD-500Z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Revio KD-210ZMetricRevio KD-500Z
2.11 MPEffective pixels5.2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.24 µmPixel pitch2.7 µm
17.96 µm²Pixel area7.29 µm²
5.57 MP/cm²Pixel density13.72 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
220 gWeight248 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMemory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Revio KD-210Z and Revio KD-500Z have the same sensor area. The Revio KD-210Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-500Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-210Z and Revio KD-500Z were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-210Z

Released in 2002, Revio KD-210Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-500Z

Released in 2002, Revio KD-500Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.2 MP effective resolution, and a 248 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras