CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica Revio KD-200Z
vs Konica Revio KD-25

Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-200Z

Konica / 2001

Revio KD-200Z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-25

Konica / 2001

Revio KD-25

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Revio KD-200Z
38 mm²
Revio KD-25
Area ratio
1.78:1
Absolute difference
17 mm²
Relative difference
77.8%

The Revio KD-25 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Revio KD-200ZMetricRevio KD-25
2.11 MPEffective pixels2.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.18 µmPixel pitch4.25 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area18.05 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density5.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
227 gWeight140 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Revio KD-25 has the larger sensor area. The Revio KD-25 has the lighter body. The Revio KD-200Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-200Z and Revio KD-25 were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-200Z

Released in 2001, Revio KD-200Z has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-25

Released in 2001, Revio KD-25 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras