CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica Revio C2
vs Konica Revio KD-220Z

Archive illustration for Konica Revio C2

Konica / 2002

Revio C2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-220Z

Konica / 2002

Revio KD-220Z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

13 mm²
Revio C2
15 mm²
Revio KD-220Z
Area ratio
1.13:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
13.1%

The Revio KD-220Z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Revio C2MetricRevio KD-220Z
1.2 MPEffective pixels2 MP
4.23 × 3.17Sensor4.5 × 3.37
3.34 µmPixel pitch2.75 µm
11.17 µm²Pixel area7.58 µm²
8.95 MP/cm²Pixel density13.19 MP/cm²
8.19Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
70 gWeight220 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Revio KD-220Z has the larger sensor area. The Revio C2 has the lighter body. The Revio KD-220Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio C2 and Revio KD-220Z were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Revio C2

Released in 2002, Revio C2 has about 13 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 70 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-220Z

Released in 2002, Revio KD-220Z has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras