CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica-Minolta Dynax 7D
vs Pentax *ist DL2

Archive illustration for Konica-Minolta Dynax 7D

Konica-Minolta / 2004

Dynax 7D

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax *ist DL2

Pentax / 2006

*ist DL2

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

369 mm²
Dynax 7D
369 mm²
*ist DL2
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Dynax 7D and *ist DL2 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Dynax 7DMetric*ist DL2
6.31 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
23.5 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.7
7.65 µmPixel pitch7.78 µm
58.47 µm²Pixel area60.48 µm²
1.71 MP/cm²Pixel density1.65 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
760 gWeight565 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type IIStorageSD/MMC card
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Dynax 7D and *ist DL2 have the same sensor area. The *ist DL2 has the lighter body. The Dynax 7D has the higher effective resolution. The *ist DL2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Dynax 7D

Released in 2004, Dynax 7D has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 6.31 MP effective resolution, and a 760 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose *ist DL2

Released in 2006, *ist DL2 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 565 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras