CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Xg
vs Samsung Digimax 200

Archive illustration for Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Xg

Konica-Minolta / 2004

DiMAGE Xg

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 200

Samsung / 2002

Digimax 200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
DiMAGE Xg
21 mm²
Digimax 200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DiMAGE Xg and Digimax 200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DiMAGE XgMetricDigimax 200
3.1 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.62 µmPixel pitch3.18 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area10.1 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density9.9 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
155 gWeight215 g
SD/MMC cardStorageSmartMedia
Lithium-Ion (NP-200) Li-ion batteryBattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DiMAGE Xg and Digimax 200 have the same sensor area. The DiMAGE Xg has the lighter body. The DiMAGE Xg has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE Xg is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE Xg

Released in 2004, DiMAGE Xg has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 200

Released in 2002, Digimax 200 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 215 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras