CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica-Minolta DiMAGE X31
vs Olympus C-220 Zoom

Archive illustration for Konica-Minolta DiMAGE X31

Konica-Minolta / 2004

DiMAGE X31

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-220 Zoom

Olympus / 2002

C-220 Zoom

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
DiMAGE X31
15 mm²
C-220 Zoom
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DiMAGE X31 and C-220 Zoom have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DiMAGE X31MetricC-220 Zoom
3.2 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.68 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area7.19 µm²
21.1 MP/cm²Pixel density13.91 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight231 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSmartMedia
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DiMAGE X31 and C-220 Zoom have the same sensor area. The DiMAGE X31 has the lighter body. The DiMAGE X31 has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE X31 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE X31

Released in 2004, DiMAGE X31 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-220 Zoom

Released in 2002, C-220 Zoom has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 231 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras