Reasons to choose DG-3Z
Released in 2003, DG-3Z has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.24 MP effective resolution, and a 310 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica DG-3Z
vs Konica Revio KD-410Z
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
DG-3Z38 mm²
Revio KD-410Z- Area ratio
- 1.78:1
- Absolute difference
- 17 mm²
- Relative difference
- 77.8%
The Revio KD-410Z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DG-3ZMetricRevio KD-410Z
3.24 MPEffective pixels4.13 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.57 µmPixel pitch3.03 µm
6.58 µm²Pixel area9.18 µm²
15.2 MP/cm²Pixel density10.9 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
310 gWeight200 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMemory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Revio KD-410Z has the larger sensor area. The Revio KD-410Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-410Z has the higher effective resolution. The DG-3Z and Revio KD-410Z were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio KD-410Z
Released in 2003, Revio KD-410Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.13 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.