CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak PixPro AZ361
vs Kodak PixPro AZ362

Archive illustration for Kodak PixPro AZ361

Kodak / 2013

PixPro AZ361

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak PixPro AZ362

Kodak / 2013

PixPro AZ362

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
PixPro AZ361
28 mm²
PixPro AZ362
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PixPro AZ361 and PixPro AZ362 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

PixPro AZ361MetricPixPro AZ362
16.15 MPEffective pixels16.38 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.32 µm
1.76 µm²Pixel area1.74 µm²
56.75 MP/cm²Pixel density57.56 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
416 gWeight416 g
SD/SDHCStorageSD/SDHC
Rechargeable Li-ion Battery LB-060 Li-ion batteryBatteryRechargeable Li-ion Battery LB-060 Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PixPro AZ361 and PixPro AZ362 have the same sensor area. The PixPro AZ361 and PixPro AZ362 have the same body weight. The PixPro AZ362 has the higher effective resolution. The PixPro AZ361 and PixPro AZ362 were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PixPro AZ361

Released in 2013, PixPro AZ361 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.15 MP effective resolution, and a 416 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PixPro AZ362

Released in 2013, PixPro AZ362 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.38 MP effective resolution, and a 416 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras