Reasons to choose EasyShare LS420
Released in 2002, EasyShare LS420 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare LS420
vs Kodak mc3
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
EasyShare LS42031 mm²
mc3- Area ratio
- 1.23:1
- Absolute difference
- 7 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.4%
The EasyShare LS420 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare LS420Metricmc3
2 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.35 µmPixel pitch10.12 µm
18.95 µm²Pixel area102.4 µm²
5.28 MP/cm²Pixel density0.98 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight198 g
Internal storageStorageCompact Flash
Kodak Lithium-Ion, dock Li-ion batteryBatteryAAA (3) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare LS420 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare LS420 has the lighter body. The EasyShare LS420 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare LS420 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose mc3
Released in 2001, mc3 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 198 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.