Reasons to choose EasyShare Z1275
Released in 2007, EasyShare Z1275 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 161 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare Z1275
vs Praktica DCZ 10.1
VS
Sensor area
42 mm²
EasyShare Z127538 mm²
DCZ 10.1- Area ratio
- 1.1:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 9.5%
The EasyShare Z1275 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare Z1275MetricDCZ 10.1
12.1 MPEffective pixels10.37 MP
7.44 × 5.58Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.85 µmPixel pitch1.91 µm
3.43 µm²Pixel area3.65 µm²
29.15 MP/cm²Pixel density27.36 MP/cm²
4.65Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
161 gWeight121 g
Memory Stick Duo, Memory Stick Pro Duo, MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare Z1275 has the larger sensor area. The DCZ 10.1 has the lighter body. The EasyShare Z1275 has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 10.1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DCZ 10.1
Released in 2009, DCZ 10.1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10.37 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.