Reasons to choose EasyShare V1003
Released in 2007, EasyShare V1003 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 142 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare V1003
vs Praktica DCZ 10.1
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
EasyShare V100338 mm²
DCZ 10.1- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare V1003 and DCZ 10.1 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare V1003MetricDCZ 10.1
10 MPEffective pixels10.37 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.95 µmPixel pitch1.91 µm
3.79 µm²Pixel area3.65 µm²
26.39 MP/cm²Pixel density27.36 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
142 gWeight121 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Kodak Lithium-Ion, dock Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare V1003 and DCZ 10.1 have the same sensor area. The DCZ 10.1 has the lighter body. The DCZ 10.1 has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 10.1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DCZ 10.1
Released in 2009, DCZ 10.1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10.37 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.