Reasons to choose EasyShare Mini
Released in 2011, EasyShare Mini has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 99 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare Mini
vs Kodak EasyShare Z990
VS
Sensor area
17 mm²
EasyShare Mini28 mm²
EasyShare Z990- Area ratio
- 1.6:1
- Absolute difference
- 10 mm²
- Relative difference
- 60.4%
The EasyShare Z990 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare MiniMetricEasyShare Z990
10 MPEffective pixels12 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.31 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
1.73 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
57.87 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
99 gWeight445 g
Internal storageStorageInternal storage
Lithium-Ion KLIC-7006 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH Rechargeable batteries)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare Z990 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare Mini has the lighter body. The EasyShare Z990 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare Mini and EasyShare Z990 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare Z990
Released in 2011, EasyShare Z990 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 445 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.