Reasons to choose EasyShare M575
Released in 2010, EasyShare M575 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 152 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M575
vs Kodak Slice
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M57528 mm²
Slice- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M575 and Slice have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M575MetricSlice
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
152 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
Rechargeable Battery KLIC-7006BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M575 and Slice have the same sensor area. The Slice has the lighter body. The EasyShare M575 and Slice have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare M575 and Slice were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Slice
Released in 2010, Slice has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.