Reasons to choose EasyShare M565
Released in 2012, EasyShare M565 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M565
vs Kodak EasyShare Z5120
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M56528 mm²
EasyShare Z5120- Area ratio
- 1.03:1
- Absolute difference
- 1 mm²
- Relative difference
- 2.6%
The EasyShare M565 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M565MetricEasyShare Z5120
14 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.32 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.73 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density57.71 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight445 g
—StorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH Rechargeable batteries)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M565 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare M565 has the lighter body. The EasyShare Z5120 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M565 and EasyShare Z5120 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare Z5120
Released in 2012, EasyShare Z5120 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 445 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.