Reasons to choose EasyShare M532
Released in 2011, EasyShare M532 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M532
vs Kodak EasyShare M583
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M53228 mm²
EasyShare M583- Area ratio
- 1.03:1
- Absolute difference
- 1 mm²
- Relative difference
- 2.6%
The EasyShare M532 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M532MetricEasyShare M583
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M532 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare M532 and EasyShare M583 have the same body weight. The EasyShare M532 and EasyShare M583 have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare M532 and EasyShare M583 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M583
Released in 2011, EasyShare M583 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.