Reasons to choose EasyShare M532
Released in 2011, EasyShare M532 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M532
vs Kodak EasyShare M565
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M53228 mm²
EasyShare M565- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M532 and EasyShare M565 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M532MetricEasyShare M565
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorage—
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M532 and EasyShare M565 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M532 and EasyShare M565 have the same body weight. The EasyShare M532 and EasyShare M565 have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare M565 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M565
Released in 2012, EasyShare M565 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.