Reasons to choose EasyShare M532
Released in 2011, EasyShare M532 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M532
vs Kodak EasyShare M5370
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M53228 mm²
EasyShare M5370- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M532 and EasyShare M5370 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M532MetricEasyShare M5370
14 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight150 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion KLIC-7006 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M532 and EasyShare M5370 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M532 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M5370 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M532 and EasyShare M5370 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M5370
Released in 2011, EasyShare M5370 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.