Reasons to choose EasyShare M320
Released in 2009, EasyShare M320 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M320
vs Kodak EasyShare MD863
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare M32025 mm²
EasyShare MD863- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M320 and EasyShare MD863 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M320MetricEasyShare MD863
9.2 MPEffective pixels8.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.64 µmPixel pitch1.74 µm
2.7 µm²Pixel area3.03 µm²
37.04 MP/cm²Pixel density33.01 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
155 gWeight125 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Rechargeable KLIC-7001 BatteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M320 and EasyShare MD863 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare MD863 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M320 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M320 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare MD863
Released in 2008, EasyShare MD863 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.