Reasons to choose EasyShare CX7525
Released in 2005, EasyShare CX7525 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 192 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare CX7525
vs Kodak EasyShare LS633
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare CX752525 mm²
EasyShare LS633- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare CX7525 and EasyShare LS633 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare CX7525MetricEasyShare LS633
4.23 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.42 µmPixel pitch2.83 µm
5.87 µm²Pixel area8.01 µm²
17.03 MP/cm²Pixel density12.48 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
192 gWeight260 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
1x CR-V3, 2x AABatteryKodak Lithium-Ion, dock (included) Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare CX7525 and EasyShare LS633 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare CX7525 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CX7525 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CX7525 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare LS633
Released in 2003, EasyShare LS633 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.