CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare CD93
vs Kodak EasyShare Z980

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare CD93

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare CD93

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Z980

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare Z980

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
EasyShare CD93
28 mm²
EasyShare Z980
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
3 mm²
Relative difference
11.6%

The EasyShare Z980 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EasyShare CD93MetricEasyShare Z980
9.5 MPEffective pixels12 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.62 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.61 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
38.24 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
137 gWeight415 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH Rechargeable batteries)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare Z980 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare CD93 has the lighter body. The EasyShare Z980 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CD93 and EasyShare Z980 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare CD93

Released in 2009, EasyShare CD93 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.5 MP effective resolution, and a 137 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Z980

Released in 2009, EasyShare Z980 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 415 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras