Reasons to choose EasyShare CD93
Released in 2009, EasyShare CD93 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.5 MP effective resolution, and a 137 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare CD93
vs Kodak EasyShare M320
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare CD9325 mm²
EasyShare M320- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare CD93 and EasyShare M320 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare CD93MetricEasyShare M320
9.5 MPEffective pixels9.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.62 µmPixel pitch1.64 µm
2.61 µm²Pixel area2.7 µm²
38.24 MP/cm²Pixel density37.04 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
137 gWeight155 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryRechargeable KLIC-7001 Battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare CD93 and EasyShare M320 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare CD93 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CD93 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CD93 and EasyShare M320 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M320
Released in 2009, EasyShare M320 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.