Reasons to choose EasyShare C180
Released in 2009, EasyShare C180 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.6 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C180
vs Kodak EasyShare M380
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare C18028 mm²
EasyShare M380- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C180 and EasyShare M380 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C180MetricEasyShare M380
10.6 MPEffective pixels10.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.64 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
2.68 µm²Pixel area2.79 µm²
37.25 MP/cm²Pixel density35.84 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight125 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryRechargeable KLIC-7003 battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C180 and EasyShare M380 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C180 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C180 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C180 and EasyShare M380 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M380
Released in 2009, EasyShare M380 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.