Reasons to choose EasyShare C160
Released in 2009, EasyShare C160 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C160
vs Kodak EasyShare C653
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare C16025 mm²
EasyShare C653- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare C160 and EasyShare C653 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C160MetricEasyShare C653
9.2 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.64 µmPixel pitch2.02 µm
2.7 µm²Pixel area4.07 µm²
37.04 MP/cm²Pixel density24.56 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight143 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C160 and EasyShare C653 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C160 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C160 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C160 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare C653
Released in 2007, EasyShare C653 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 143 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.