Reasons to choose EasyShare C142
Released in 2010, EasyShare C142 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10.3 MP effective resolution, and a 170 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C142
vs Kodak EasyShare M530
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare C14228 mm²
EasyShare M530- Area ratio
- 1.15:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 14.6%
The EasyShare M530 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C142MetricEasyShare M530
10.3 MPEffective pixels12 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.55 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.41 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
41.47 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
170 gWeight150 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryRechargeable Battery KLIC-7006
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M530 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare M530 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M530 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C142 and EasyShare M530 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M530
Released in 2010, EasyShare M530 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.