Reasons to choose EasyShare DX3900
Released in 2001, EasyShare DX3900 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare DX3900
vs Kodak EasyShare LS420
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
EasyShare DX390038 mm²
EasyShare LS420- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare DX3900 and EasyShare LS420 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare DX3900MetricEasyShare LS420
3.1 MPEffective pixels2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.5 µmPixel pitch4.35 µm
12.22 µm²Pixel area18.95 µm²
8.18 MP/cm²Pixel density5.28 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
260 gWeight160 g
Compact Flash Type IStorageInternal storage
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryKodak Lithium-Ion, dock Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare DX3900 and EasyShare LS420 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare LS420 has the lighter body. The EasyShare DX3900 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare LS420 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare LS420
Released in 2002, EasyShare LS420 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.