Reasons to choose EasyShare DX3600
Released in 2001, EasyShare DX3600 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.2 MP effective resolution, and a 250 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare DX3600
vs Kodak EasyShare DX4900
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
EasyShare DX360025 mm²
EasyShare DX4900- Area ratio
- 1.24:1
- Absolute difference
- 6 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.7%
The EasyShare DX3600 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare DX3600MetricEasyShare DX4900
2.2 MPEffective pixels4 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.74 µmPixel pitch2.49 µm
13.96 µm²Pixel area6.21 µm²
7.16 MP/cm²Pixel density16.1 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
250 gWeight260 g
Internal storageStorageCompact Flash Type I
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare DX3600 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare DX3600 has the lighter body. The EasyShare DX4900 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare DX4900 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare DX4900
Released in 2002, EasyShare DX4900 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.