CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak DCS760
vs Pentax *ist D

Archive illustration for Kodak DCS760

Kodak / 2001

DCS760

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax *ist D

Pentax / 2003

*ist D

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

510 mm²
DCS760
369 mm²
*ist D
Area ratio
1.38:1
Absolute difference
141 mm²
Relative difference
38.1%

The DCS760 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DCS760Metric*ist D
6.1 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
27.65 × 18.43Sensor23.5 × 15.7
9.14 µmPixel pitch7.78 µm
83.54 µm²Pixel area60.48 µm²
1.2 MP/cm²Pixel density1.65 MP/cm²
1.3Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
1,860 gWeight550 g
PCMCIA (2 x type II / 1 x type III)StorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Kodak NiMHBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCS760 has the larger sensor area. The *ist D has the lighter body. The DCS760 and *ist D have the same effective resolution. The *ist D is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCS760

Released in 2001, DCS760 has about 510 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,860 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose *ist D

Released in 2003, *ist D has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 550 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras