CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak DCS315
vs Kodak DCS620

Archive illustration for Kodak DCS315

Kodak / 1998

DCS315

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak DCS620

Kodak / 1999

DCS620

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

510 mm²
DCS315
510 mm²
DCS620
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DCS315 and DCS620 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DCS315MetricDCS620
1.5 MPEffective pixels2 MP
27.65 × 18.43Sensor27.65 × 18.43
18.43 µmPixel pitch15.96 µm
339.73 µm²Pixel area254.79 µm²
0.29 MP/cm²Pixel density0.39 MP/cm²
1.3Crop factor1.3
—Maximum video—
1,800 gWeight1,580 g
PCMCIA (type II or III)StoragePCMCIA (2 x type II / 1 x type III)
AA (6) batteries (Lithium / NiMH)BatteryKodak NiCD / NiMH

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCS315 and DCS620 have the same sensor area. The DCS620 has the lighter body. The DCS620 has the higher effective resolution. The DCS620 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCS315

Released in 1998, DCS315 has about 510 mm² of sensor area, 1.5 MP effective resolution, and a 1,800 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DCS620

Released in 1999, DCS620 has about 510 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 1,580 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras