Reasons to choose DC240
Released in 1999, DC240 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 420 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak DC240
vs Kodak DC265
VS
Sensor area
40 mm²
DC24040 mm²
DC265- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC240 and DC265 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DC240MetricDC265
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.5 MP
7.27 × 5.46Sensor7.27 × 5.46
5.75 µmPixel pitch5.14 µm
33.08 µm²Pixel area26.46 µm²
3.02 MP/cm²Pixel density3.78 MP/cm²
4.76Crop factor4.76
—Maximum video—
420 gWeight540 g
Compact FlashStorageCompactFlash type I
AA NiMH (4) batteries includedBatteryAA NiMH (4) batteries included
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC240 and DC265 have the same sensor area. The DC240 has the lighter body. The DC265 has the higher effective resolution. The DC240 and DC265 were both released in 1999. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC265
Released in 1999, DC265 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 1.5 MP effective resolution, and a 540 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.