Reasons to choose DC200
Released in 1998, DC200 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 400 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak DC200
vs Kodak DC220
VS
Sensor area
40 mm²
DC20040 mm²
DC220- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC200 and DC220 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DC200MetricDC220
0.9 MPEffective pixels0.9 MP
7.27 × 5.46Sensor7.27 × 5.46
6.64 µmPixel pitch6.64 µm
44.1 µm²Pixel area44.1 µm²
2.27 MP/cm²Pixel density2.27 MP/cm²
4.76Crop factor4.76
—Maximum video—
400 gWeight550 g
Compact FlashStorageCompact Flash
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC200 and DC220 have the same sensor area. The DC200 has the lighter body. The DC200 and DC220 have the same effective resolution. The DC200 and DC220 were both released in 1998. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC220
Released in 1998, DC220 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 550 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.