CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak DC200
vs Kodak DC200 plus

Archive illustration for Kodak DC200

Kodak / 1998

DC200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak DC200 plus

Kodak / 1999

DC200 plus

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

40 mm²
DC200
40 mm²
DC200 plus
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC200 and DC200 plus have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC200MetricDC200 plus
0.9 MPEffective pixels0.9 MP
7.27 × 5.46Sensor7.27 × 5.46
6.64 µmPixel pitch6.64 µm
44.1 µm²Pixel area44.1 µm²
2.27 MP/cm²Pixel density2.27 MP/cm²
4.76Crop factor4.76
—Maximum video—
400 gWeight400 g
Compact FlashStorageCompact Flash
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC200 and DC200 plus have the same sensor area. The DC200 and DC200 plus have the same body weight. The DC200 and DC200 plus have the same effective resolution. The DC200 plus is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC200

Released in 1998, DC200 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 400 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC200 plus

Released in 1999, DC200 plus has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 400 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras