Reasons to choose DC200 plus
Released in 1999, DC200 plus has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 400 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak DC200 plus
vs Kodak DC265
VS
Sensor area
40 mm²
DC200 plus40 mm²
DC265- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC200 plus and DC265 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DC200 plusMetricDC265
0.9 MPEffective pixels1.5 MP
7.27 × 5.46Sensor7.27 × 5.46
6.64 µmPixel pitch5.14 µm
44.1 µm²Pixel area26.46 µm²
2.27 MP/cm²Pixel density3.78 MP/cm²
4.76Crop factor4.76
—Maximum video—
400 gWeight540 g
Compact FlashStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA NiMH (4) batteries included
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC200 plus and DC265 have the same sensor area. The DC200 plus has the lighter body. The DC265 has the higher effective resolution. The DC200 plus and DC265 were both released in 1999. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC265
Released in 1999, DC265 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 1.5 MP effective resolution, and a 540 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.